Arc Pro A30M vs Arc A350M

Place in the ranking	428	404
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	41.09	22.73
Architecture	Xe-HPG (2022−2024)	Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code name	DG2-128	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	30 March 2022 (4 years ago)	8 August 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1024
Core clock speed	1150 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	2200 MHz	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	6 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	105.6	128.0
ROPs	24	32
TMUs	48	64
Ray Tracing Cores	6	8
L1 Cache	1.1 MB	1.5 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.0 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.4	1.4

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	36 +2.9%	35−40 −2.9%
1440p	17 −5.9%	18−20 +5.9%
4K	9 +0%	9−10 +0%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	30−35 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −12.2%	80−85 +12.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 −14.8%	30−35 +14.8%

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	30−35 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −8.5%	60−65 +8.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −12.2%	80−85 +12.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	19 −63.2%	30−35 +63.2%
Far Cry 5	42 −16.7%	45−50 +16.7%
Fortnite	75−80 −9.1%	80−85 +9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −8.8%	60−65 +8.8%
Forza Horizon 5	50 +6.4%	45−50 −6.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
Valorant	110−120 −6.2%	120−130 +6.2%

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	30−35 −11.8%	35−40 +11.8%
Battlefield 5	55−60 −8.5%	60−65 +8.5%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 −12.2%	80−85 +12.2%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	180−190 −7%	190−200 +7%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 −93.8%	30−35 +93.8%
Dota 2	62 −4.8%	65−70 +4.8%
Far Cry 5	39 −25.6%	45−50 +25.6%
Fortnite	75−80 −9.1%	80−85 +9.1%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −8.8%	60−65 +8.8%
Forza Horizon 5	47 +0%	45−50 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	26 −115%	55−60 +115%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −10.7%	30−35 +10.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	43 +7.5%	40−45 −7.5%
Valorant	110−120 −6.2%	120−130 +6.2%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	55−60 −8.5%	60−65 +8.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	12 −158%	30−35 +158%
Dota 2	59 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
Far Cry 5	37 −32.4%	45−50 +32.4%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −8.8%	60−65 +8.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −12.2%	55−60 +12.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	19 −111%	40−45 +111%
Valorant	110−120 −6.2%	120−130 +6.2%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

75−80

−9.1%

80−85
+9.1%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −11.5%	27−30 +11.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	100−105 −10%	110−120 +10%
Grand Theft Auto V	10 −140%	24−27 +140%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−105 −10%	110−120 +10%
Valorant	120−130 −8.7%	130−140 +8.7%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	35−40 −13.5%	40−45 +13.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Far Cry 5	25 −32%	30−35 +32%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −9.1%	35−40 +9.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

27−30

−13.8%

30−35
+13.8%

4K
High

Atomic Heart	10−12 −9.1%	12−14 +9.1%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Grand Theft Auto V	11 −145%	27−30 +145%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	15 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
Valorant	60−65 −14.1%	70−75 +14.1%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	18−20 −15.8%	21−24 +15.8%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%
Dota 2	45−50 −2%	50−55 +2%
Far Cry 5	12 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −13%	24−27 +13%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%

4K
Epic

Fortnite

12−14

−15.4%

14−16
+15.4%

This is how Arc A350M and Arc Pro A30M compete in popular games:

Arc A350M is 3% faster in 1080p
Arc Pro A30M is 6% faster in 1440p
A tie in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A350M is 8% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc Pro A30M is 158% faster.

All in all, in popular games: