Quadro NVS 295 vs ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1428
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.91
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV370G98
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2005 (21 years ago)7 May 2009 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$54.50

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data8
Core clock speed400 MHz540 MHz
Number of transistors107 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data23 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6004.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0208 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed300 MHz695 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s11.12 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL2.03.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2005 7 May 2009
Chip lithography 110 nm 65 nm

NVS 295 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 69% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X600 PRO and Quadro NVS 295. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 22 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X600 PRO or Quadro NVS 295, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.