Quadro NVS 210S vs ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1556
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.42
ArchitectureRage 9 (2003−2006)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameRV370C51
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 July 2005 (21 years ago)22 December 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Core clock speed400 MHz425 MHz
Number of transistors107 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data11 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6000.85
ROPs41
TMUs42

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCI
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount256 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed300 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.09.0c (9_3)
Shader Modelno data3.0
OpenGL2.02.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2005 22 December 2003
Chip lithography 110 nm 90 nm

ATI All-In-Wonder X600 PRO has an age advantage of 1 year.

NVS 210S, on the other hand, has a 22% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder X600 PRO and Quadro NVS 210S. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder X600 PRO is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 210S is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder X600 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 210S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder X600 PRO or Quadro NVS 210S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.