Radeon RX 6650 XT vs A10G

Place in the ranking	187	115
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	53.37
Power efficiency	16.87	18.07
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2025)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code name	GA102	Navi 23
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	12 April 2021 (5 years ago)	10 May 2022 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	9216	2048
Core clock speed	1320 MHz	2055 MHz
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	2635 MHz
Number of transistors	28,300 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	176 Watt
Texture fill rate	492.5	337.3
Floating-point processing power	31.52 TFLOPS	10.79 TFLOPS
ROPs	96	64
TMUs	288	128
Tensor Cores	288	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	72	32
L0 Cache	no data	512 KB
L1 Cache	9 MB	512 KB
L2 Cache	6 MB	2 MB
L3 Cache	no data	32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	8-pin EPS	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1563 MHz	2190 MHz
Memory bandwidth	600.2 GB/s	280.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR	+	+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	2.1
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-
DLSS	+	-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

A10G 32.57

RX 6650 XT 40.94
+25.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

A10G 13598
Samples: 6

RX 6650 XT 17093
+25.7%

Samples: 5363

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	100−110	138 +38%
1440p	50−55	69 +38%
4K	27−30	36 +33.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	2.89
1440p	no data	5.78
4K	no data	11.08

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart	212	212
Counter-Strike 2	346	346
Cyberpunk 2077	128	128
Resident Evil 4 Remake	225	225

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart	153	153
Battlefield 5	130−140	130−140
Counter-Strike 2	342	342
Cyberpunk 2077	108	108
Far Cry 5	173	173
Fortnite	170−180	170−180
Forza Horizon 4	150−160	150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170	160−170
Valorant	240−250	240−250

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart	89	89
Battlefield 5	130−140	130−140
Counter-Strike 2	181	181
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	270−280	270−280
Cyberpunk 2077	88	88
Dota 2	171	171
Far Cry 5	163	163
Fortnite	170−180	170−180
Forza Horizon 4	150−160	150−160
Grand Theft Auto V	147	147
Metro Exodus	102	102
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170	160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	182	182
Valorant	240−250	240−250

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5	130−140	130−140
Cyberpunk 2077	78	78
Dota 2	136	136
Far Cry 5	151	151
Forza Horizon 4	150−160	150−160
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	160−170	160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	107	107
Valorant	240−250	240−250

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite

170−180

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2	108	108
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	290−300	290−300
Grand Theft Auto V	77	77
Metro Exodus	58	58
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180	170−180
Valorant	270−280	270−280

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5	100−110	100−110
Cyberpunk 2077	44	44
Far Cry 5	114	114
Forza Horizon 4	120−130	120−130
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	80−85	80−85

1440p
Epic

Fortnite

110−120

4K
High

Atomic Heart	30−35	30−35
Counter-Strike 2	27	27
Grand Theft Auto V	72	72
Metro Exodus	37	37
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56	56
Valorant	250−260	250−260

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5	65−70	65−70
Counter-Strike 2	45−50	45−50
Cyberpunk 2077	18	18
Dota 2	97	97
Far Cry 5	55	55
Forza Horizon 4	80−85	80−85
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	55−60	55−60

4K
Epic

Fortnite

55−60

This is how A10G and RX 6650 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6650 XT is 38% faster in 1080p
RX 6650 XT is 38% faster in 1440p
RX 6650 XT is 33% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	32.57	40.94
Recency	12 April 2021	10 May 2022
Maximum RAM amount	12 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	176 Watt