Celeron N4020C vs Z-01
Primary details
Comparing Z-01 and Celeron N4020C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | 2423 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Architecture codename | Desna (2011) | no data |
Release date | 1 June 2011 (13 years ago) | 1 January 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Z-01 and Celeron N4020C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 1 GHz | no data |
L1 cache | 128 KB | no data |
L2 cache | 1 MB | no data |
L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
Chip lithography | 40 nm | no data |
Die size | 75 mm2 | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Z-01 and Celeron N4020C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FT1 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Z-01 and Celeron N4020C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | MMX(+), SSE(1,2,3,3S,4A, AMD-V | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Z-01 and Celeron N4020C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Z-01 and Celeron N4020C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 Single-channel | no data |
ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon HD 6250 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Z-01 and Celeron N4020C.
PCI Express lanes | no data | 6 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 June 2011 | 1 January 2021 |
Celeron N4020C has an age advantage of 9 years.
We couldn't decide between Z-01 and Celeron N4020C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Z-01 and Celeron N4020C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.