Ryzen 7 7840S vs Xeon w5-3435X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w5-3435X
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 270 Watt
30.26
+88%

Xeon w5-3435X outperforms Ryzen 7 7840S by an impressive 88% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking149439
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation54.23no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataPhoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040)
Power efficiency10.2241.95
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023)
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)5 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,589no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz5.1 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache2 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache45 MB16 MB
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size4x 477 mm2178 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4677FP7/FP7r2/FP8
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Ryzen AI, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes112no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w5-3435X 30.26
+88%
Ryzen 7 7840S 16.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w5-3435X 46306
+88%
Ryzen 7 7840S 24635

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.26 16.10
Recency 15 February 2023 5 January 2023
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon w5-3435X has a 88% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen 7 7840S, on the other hand, has 671.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w5-3435X is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 7 7840S in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon w5-3435X is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7840S is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w5-3435X and Ryzen 7 7840S, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w5-3435X
Xeon w5-3435X
AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
Ryzen 7 7840S

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 8 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3435X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 7 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7840S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w5-3435X or Ryzen 7 7840S, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.