EPYC 4465P vs Xeon w5-3425

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w5-3425
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 270 Watt
22.41
EPYC 4465P
2025
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
31.39
+40.1%

EPYC 4465P outperforms Xeon w5-3425 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking289168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation50.9275.39
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency3.2118.67
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Grado (2025)
Release date15 February 2023 (2 years ago)13 May 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,189$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4465P has 48% better value for money than Xeon w5-3425.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Performance-cores12no data
Threads2424
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm4 nm
Die size4x 477 mm22x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4677AM5
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes11224

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon w5-3425 22.41
EPYC 4465P 31.39
+40.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon w5-3425 36024
EPYC 4465P 50465
+40.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.41 31.39
Recency 15 February 2023 13 May 2025
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 65 Watt

EPYC 4465P has a 40.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 315.4% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 4465P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon w5-3425 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w5-3425
Xeon w5-3425
AMD EPYC 4465P
EPYC 4465P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 6 votes

Rate Xeon w5-3425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4465P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon w5-3425 and EPYC 4465P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.