Apple M3 Max 16-Core vs Xeon w5-2465X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon w5-2465X
2023
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
30.65
+14.5%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
2023
16 cores / 16 threads, 78 Watt
26.76

Xeon w5-2465X outperforms Apple M3 Max 16-Core by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking143186
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation63.19no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M3
Power efficiency13.9731.28
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)no data
Release date15 February 2023 (1 year ago)30 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,389no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.748 GHz
Boost clock speed4.7 GHz4.06 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache2 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache33.75 MBno data
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data92000 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4677no data
Power consumption (TDP)200 Watt78 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4800no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AApple M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core.

PCIe version5.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon w5-2465X 30.65
+14.5%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 26.76

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon w5-2465X 46906
+14.5%
Apple M3 Max 16-Core 40959

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.65 26.76
Recency 15 February 2023 30 October 2023
Threads 32 16
Power consumption (TDP) 200 Watt 78 Watt

Xeon w5-2465X has a 14.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Apple M3 Max 16-Core, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and 156.4% lower power consumption.

The Xeon w5-2465X is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M3 Max 16-Core in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon w5-2465X is a server/workstation processor while Apple M3 Max 16-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon w5-2465X and Apple M3 Max 16-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon w5-2465X
Xeon w5-2465X
Apple M3 Max 16-Core
M3 Max 16-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 4 votes

Rate Xeon w5-2465X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 252 votes

Rate Apple M3 Max 16-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon w5-2465X or Apple M3 Max 16-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.