Xeon L5609 vs X5675

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	1323	1790
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.19	0.04
Market segment	Server	Server
Architecture codename	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
Release date	14 February 2011 (13 years ago)	16 March 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$162	no data
Current price	$78 (0.5x MSRP)	$2666

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5675 has 5375% better value for money than Xeon L5609.

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	6 (Hexa-Core)	4 (Quad-Core)
Threads	12	4
Base clock speed	3.06 GHz	1.86 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.46 GHz	1.86 GHz
L1 cache	64 KB (per core)	64 KB (per core)
L2 cache	256 KB (per core)	256 KB (per core)
L3 cache	12288 KB (shared)	12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography	32 nm	32 nm
Die size	239 mm2	239 mm2
Maximum core temperature	81 °C	63 °C
Number of transistors	1,170 million	1,170 million
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
Unlocked multiplier	No	No

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	2	2
Socket	FCLGA1366,LGA1366	FCLGA1366,LGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	40 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2	Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI	+	+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Turbo Boost Technology	1.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
Idle States	+	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	-
Demand Based Switching	+	+
PAE	40 Bit	40 Bit
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	+
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	+
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR3	DDR3
Maximum memory size	288 GB	288 GB
Max memory channels	3	3
Maximum memory bandwidth	32 GB/s	25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support	+	+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609.

PCIe version

2.0

2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

X5675 outperforms L5609 by 95% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	4.16	2.13
Recency	14 February 2011	16 March 2010
Physical cores	6	4
Threads	12	4
Power consumption (TDP)	95 Watt	40 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5675 and Xeon L5609, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---