Opteron 252 vs Xeon X5675
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5675 outperforms Opteron 252 by a whopping 749% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1606 | 3143 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.24 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 0.20 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Troy (2005) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (14 years ago) | February 2005 (20 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $162 | $63 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.06 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.46 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 12288 KB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 2 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | 940 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 92 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Opteron 252.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.65 | 0.43 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 92 Watt |
Xeon X5675 has a 748.8% higher aggregate performance score, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron 252, on the other hand, has 3.3% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Opteron 252 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
