Core 2 Extreme X7800 vs Xeon X5675

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5675
2011, $162
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.76
+470%
Core 2 Extreme X7800
2007, $851
2 cores / 2 threads, 44 Watt
0.66

Xeon X5675 outperforms Core 2 Extreme X7800 by a whopping 470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17883128
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.78no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Extreme
Power efficiency1.640.62
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Merom XE (2007)
Release date14 February 2011 (15 years ago)17 July 2007 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$162$851

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.06 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.6 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache12288 KB (shared)4 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size239 mm2143 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °C100 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.1V-1.375V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366PPGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt44 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5675 3.76
+470%
Core 2 Extreme X7800 0.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X5675 6440
+466%
Samples: 430
Core 2 Extreme X7800 1138
Samples: 5

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.76 0.66
Recency 14 February 2011 17 July 2007
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 44 Watt

Xeon X5675 has a 470% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 103% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Extreme X7800, on the other hand, has 116% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon X5675 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Extreme X7800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5675 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Extreme X7800 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 690 votes

Rate Xeon X5675 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Core 2 Extreme X7800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5675 and Core 2 Extreme X7800, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.