Core 2 Quad Q9000 vs Xeon X5672
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X5672 outperforms Core 2 Quad Q9000 by a whopping 214% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1874 | 2751 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.08 | 0.03 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Core 2 Quad |
| Power efficiency | 3.23 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| Release date | 14 February 2011 (14 years ago) | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $115 | $348 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon X5672 has 3500% better value for money than Core 2 Quad Q9000.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 1066 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 6 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 107 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 83 °C | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 410 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.05V-1.175V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | no data |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | PGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | - |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
Security technologies
Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Quad Q9000.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.86 | 0.91 |
| Recency | 14 February 2011 | 1 January 2009 |
| Threads | 8 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 45 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon X5672 has a 214.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.
Core 2 Quad Q9000, on the other hand, has 111.1% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon X5672 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Quad Q9000 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X5672 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q9000 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
