Core 2 Duo T8300 vs Xeon X5672

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5672
2011, $115
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
2.85
+243%
Core 2 Duo T8300
2008, $241
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.83

Xeon X5672 outperforms Core 2 Duo T8300 by a whopping 243% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking18742812
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.070.04
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency3.22no data
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date14 February 2011 (14 years ago)10 January 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$115$241

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon X5672 has 2575% better value for money than Core 2 Duo T8300.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads82
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache256 KB (per core)3 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)3 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size239 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperature83 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.25V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2no data
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366BGA479,PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Demand Based Switching+-
PAE40 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size288 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon X5672 2.85
+243%
Core 2 Duo T8300 0.83

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon X5672 5036
+242%
Samples: 31
Core 2 Duo T8300 1472
Samples: 596

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.85 0.83
Recency 14 February 2011 10 January 2008
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 8 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon X5672 has a 243.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T8300, on the other hand, has 171.4% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon X5672 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core 2 Duo T8300 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5672 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Duo T8300 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5672
Xeon X5672
Intel Core 2 Duo T8300
Core 2 Duo T8300

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Xeon X5672 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 295 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon X5672 and Core 2 Duo T8300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.