EPYC 7573X vs Xeon X5670
Aggregate performance score
EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon X5670 by a whopping 1039% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1373 | 38 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 1.06 | 6.45 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Xeon (Desktop) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Westmere-EP (2010−2011) | Milan-X (2022) |
| Release date | 16 March 2010 (14 years ago) | 22 March 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $67 | no data |
| Current price | $44 (0.7x MSRP) | $5250 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
EPYC 7573X has 508% better value for money than Xeon X5670.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 2.93 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus support | 6400 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 12 MB (shared) | 768 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | 239 mm2 | 8x 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 81 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 1,170 million | 33,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 2 | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA1366,LGA1366 | SP3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 40 Bit | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR4-3200 |
| Maximum memory size | 288 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 32 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 128 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 1039% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
EPYC 7573X outperforms Xeon X5670 by 1040% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.94 | 44.89 |
| Recency | 16 March 2010 | 22 March 2022 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 32 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 280 Watt |
The EPYC 7573X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon X5670 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5670 and EPYC 7573X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
