Celeron J1900 vs Xeon X5650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X5650
2010
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
3.59
+399%
Celeron J1900
2013
4 cores / 4 threads, 10 Watt
0.72

Xeon X5650 outperforms Celeron J1900 by a whopping 399% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15032676
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.25no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency3.586.81
Architecture codenameWestmere-EP (2010−2011)Bay Trail-D (2013)
Release date16 March 2010 (14 years ago)1 November 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$53$82

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads124
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.06 GHz2.42 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)224 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)2 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm22 nm
Die size239 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature81 °C105 °C
Number of transistors1,170 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA1366,LGA1366FCBGA1170
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE40 Bit36 Bit
FDIno data-
RSTno data-

Security technologies

Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900 are enumerated here.

VT-d+-
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size288 GB8 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Intel Atom® Processor Z3700 Series
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data854 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X5650 3.59
+399%
Celeron J1900 0.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X5650 5710
+396%
Celeron J1900 1151

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X5650 446
+158%
Celeron J1900 173

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X5650 2207
+329%
Celeron J1900 515

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.59 0.72
Recency 16 March 2010 1 November 2013
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 4
Chip lithography 32 nm 22 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X5650 has a 398.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

Celeron J1900, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 45.5% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X5650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron J1900 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X5650 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J1900 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X5650 and Celeron J1900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X5650
Xeon X5650
Intel Celeron J1900
Celeron J1900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 452 votes

Rate Xeon X5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 196 votes

Rate Celeron J1900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X5650 or Celeron J1900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.