Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X3460

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3460
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.94
+2.1%

Xeon X3460 outperforms Celeron J4105 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19581969
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.36
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Celeron
Power efficiency1.8617.29
Architecture codenameno dataGoldmont Plus (2017)
Release date1 July 2009 (15 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$107

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.8 GHz1.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.46 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplierno data15
L1 cacheno data56 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data4 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB Intel® Smart Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data93 mm2
Maximum core temperature73 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156FCBGA1090
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2
AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data-
Turbo Boost Technology1.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
GPIOno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4
Maximum memory size32 GB8 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 600
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data750 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.4

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105.

PCIe version2.02.0
PCI Express lanes166
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data2
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Portsno data2
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data-
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3460 1.94
+2.1%
Celeron J4105 1.90

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon X3460 2957
+1.7%
Celeron J4105 2908

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon X3460 473
+45.5%
Celeron J4105 325

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon X3460 1476
+60.6%
Celeron J4105 919

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.94 1.90
Recency 1 July 2009 11 December 2017
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon X3460 has a 2.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Celeron J4105, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 850% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105.

Be aware that Xeon X3460 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J4105 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3460 and Celeron J4105, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3460
Xeon X3460
Intel Celeron J4105
Celeron J4105

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 100 votes

Rate Xeon X3460 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 300 votes

Rate Celeron J4105 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3460 or Celeron J4105, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.