Xeon D-2766NT vs X3450
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2009 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 1.79 | no data |
Release date | 1 July 2009 (15 years ago) | 1 January 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 14 (Tetradeca-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 28 |
Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.1 GHz |
L3 cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 20 MB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Maximum core temperature | 73 °C | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | FCLGA1156,LGA1156 | FCBGA2579 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 97 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | Intel® AVX-512 |
AES-NI | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
QuickAssist | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 1.0 | 2.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
SGX | no data | Yes with Intel® SPS |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333 | DDR4 |
Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 1 TB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 21 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 4.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | 32 |
USB revision | no data | 3.0 |
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports | no data | 24 |
Number of USB ports | no data | 4 |
Integrated LAN | no data | + |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 1 July 2009 | 1 January 2022 |
Physical cores | 4 | 14 |
Threads | 8 | 28 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 10 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 97 Watt |
Xeon X3450 has 2.1% lower power consumption.
Xeon D-2766NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and a 350% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3450 and Xeon D-2766NT, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.