Processor N200 vs Xeon X3440

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon X3440
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 95 Watt
1.74
+11.5%
Processor N200
2023
4 cores / 4 threads, 6 Watt
1.56

Xeon X3440 outperforms Processor N200 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon X3440 and Processor N200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking20402122
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.53no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataIntel Alder Lake-N
Power efficiency1.7324.62
Architecture codenameLynnfield (2009−2010)Alder Lake-N (2023)
Release date8 September 2009 (15 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$215$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon X3440 and Processor N200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.53 GHz0.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)96 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm10 nm
Die size296 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data105 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)73 °Cno data
Number of transistors774 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3440 and Processor N200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1156,LGA1156Intel BGA 1264
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3440 and Processor N200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3440 and Processor N200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3440 and Processor N200 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3440 and Processor N200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333DDR4, DDR5 4800 MHz Single-channel
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth21 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AIntel UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs (Rocket Lake) (450 - 750 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3440 and Processor N200.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanes169

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.74 1.56
Recency 8 September 2009 3 January 2023
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon X3440 has a 11.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.

Processor N200, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 350% more advanced lithography process, and 1483.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon X3440 is our recommended choice as it beats the Processor N200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon X3440 is a server/workstation processor while Processor N200 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3440 and Processor N200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3440
Xeon X3440
Intel Processor N200
Processor N200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 654 votes

Rate Xeon X3440 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 148 votes

Rate Processor N200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3440 or Processor N200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.