Xeon E5430 vs X3380
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X3380 outperforms Xeon E5430 by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2225 | 2343 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 1.62 | 1.68 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Release date | 1 January 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2007 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3380 and Xeon E5430 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Base clock speed | 3.16 GHz | 2.66 GHz |
| L3 cache | 12 MB L2 Cache | 12 MB L2 Cache |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 67 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-1.3625V | 0.85V-1.35V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3380 and Xeon E5430 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Socket | LGA775 | LGA771 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and Xeon E5430. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
| Demand Based Switching | - | + |
| FSB parity | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon X3380 and Xeon E5430 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and Xeon E5430 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.60 | 1.40 |
| Recency | 1 January 2009 | 1 October 2007 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 80 Watt |
Xeon X3380 has a 14.3% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 year.
Xeon E5430, on the other hand, has 18.8% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon X3380 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E5430 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
