Xeon E-2488 vs Celeron T1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Celeron T1600
2008
35 Watt
0.35
Xeon E-2488
2023
8 cores / 16 threads, 95 Watt
18.38
+5151%

Xeon E-2488 outperforms Celeron T1600 by a whopping 5151% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3066327
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.32
Market segmentLaptopServer
Power efficiency0.9518.30
Architecture codenameno dataRaptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date1 October 2008 (16 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$606

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threadsno data16
Base clock speed1.66 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data5.6 GHz
Bus rateno data16 GT/s
L1 cacheno data80 KB (per core)
L2 cacheno data2 MB (per core)
L3 cache1 MB L2 Cache24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range1.075V-1.175Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketPPGA478FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-2
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488.

PCIe versionno data5
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Celeron T1600 0.35
Xeon E-2488 18.38
+5151%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Celeron T1600 551
Xeon E-2488 29191
+5198%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 18.38
Recency 1 October 2008 14 December 2023
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 95 Watt

Celeron T1600 has 171.4% lower power consumption.

Xeon E-2488, on the other hand, has a 5151.4% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 15 years.

The Xeon E-2488 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron T1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Celeron T1600 is a notebook processor while Xeon E-2488 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron T1600 and Xeon E-2488, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Celeron T1600
Celeron T1600
Intel Xeon E-2488
Xeon E-2488

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 8 votes

Rate Celeron T1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Xeon E-2488 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Celeron T1600 or Xeon E-2488, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.