3015e vs Xeon X3380

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon X3380
2009
1.66
3015e
2020
2 cores / 4 threads
1.75
+5.4%

3015e outperforms Xeon X3380 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon X3380 and 3015e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking19551907
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Architecture codenameno dataPollock (Zen)
Release date1 January 2009 (15 years ago)4 August 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed Specifications

Xeon X3380 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical coresno data2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data4
Base clock speed3.16 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speedno data2.3 GHz
L1 cacheno data192 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cache12 MB L2 Cache4 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature71 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon X3380 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketLGA775FT5
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3380 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR4-1600 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NIno data+
FMAno data+
AVXno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon X3380 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3380 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3380 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon X3380 1.66
3015e 1.75
+5.4%

3015e outperforms Xeon X3380 by 5% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon X3380 2568
3015e 2714
+5.7%

3015e outperforms Xeon X3380 by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.66 1.75
Recency 1 January 2009 4 August 2020
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 6 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon X3380 and 3015e.

Be aware that Xeon X3380 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3380 and 3015e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon X3380
Xeon X3380
AMD 3015e
3015e

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 9 votes

Rate Xeon X3380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 29 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon X3380 or 3015e, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.