Pentium G6950 vs Xeon X3330
Aggregate performance score
Xeon X3330 outperforms Pentium G6950 by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 2135 | 2505 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | no data | Clarkdale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 1 July 2008 (15 years ago) | 7 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $60 |
| Current price | $768 | $203 (3.4x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon X3330 has 100% better value for money than Pentium G6950.
Detailed specifications
Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | no data | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.66 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | no data | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 6 MB L2 Cache | 3 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | no data | 81 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 71 °C | 73 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 382 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | 0.85V-13625V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | LGA775 | FCLGA1156 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | - |
| Demand Based Switching | - | - |
| PAE | no data | 36 Bit |
| FDI | no data | + |
| FSB parity | - | no data |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | - | - |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 16.38 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 17 GB/s |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950.
| PCIe version | no data | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon X3330 outperforms Pentium G6950 by 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon X3330 outperforms Pentium G6950 by 71% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.36 | 0.80 |
| Recency | 1 July 2008 | 7 January 2010 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 73 Watt |
The Xeon X3330 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium G6950 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon X3330 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium G6950 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon X3330 and Pentium G6950, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
