A6-9220 vs Xeon W3680

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3680
2010, $350
6 cores / 12 threads, 130 Watt
4.02
+436%

Xeon W3680 outperforms A6-9220 by a whopping 436% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16132924
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.70no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataBristol Ridge
Power efficiency1.302.11
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameGulftown (2010−2011)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date16 March 2010 (16 years ago)1 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$350no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Basic parameters of Xeon W3680 and A6-9220: number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.33 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz2.9 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)160 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache12 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography32 nm28 nm
Die size239 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C90 °C
Number of transistors1,170 million1200 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3680 and A6-9220 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA1366BGA
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3680 and A6-9220. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Virtualization,
AES-NI+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3680 and A6-9220 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3680 and A6-9220 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3680 and A6-9220. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth32 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon R4 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 655 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3680 and A6-9220.

PCIe version2.0no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W3680 4.02
+436%
A6-9220 0.75

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W3680 7032
+432%
Samples: 497
A6-9220 1322
Samples: 256

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.02 0.75
Recency 16 March 2010 1 June 2016
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 32 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 15 Watt

Xeon W3680 has a 436% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads.

A6-9220, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 14% more advanced lithography process, and 767% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W3680 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A6-9220 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3680 is a server/workstation processor while A6-9220 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 154 votes

Rate Xeon W3680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 445 votes

Rate A6-9220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W3680 and A6-9220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.