Xeon w9-3595X vs W3520

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.90
Xeon w9-3595X
2024
60 cores / 120 threads, 385 Watt
64.93
+3317%

w9-3595X outperforms W3520 by a whopping 3317% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking195912
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.3224.31
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)24 August 2024 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$404$5,889

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon w9-3595X has 7497% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)60 (Hexaconta-Core)
Threads8120
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz4.8 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)112.5 MB
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size263 mm24x 477 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data81 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt385 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size24 GB4 TB
Max memory channels38
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X.

PCIe version2.05.0
PCI Express lanesno data112

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3520 1.90
Xeon w9-3595X 64.93
+3317%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3520 2935
Xeon w9-3595X 100127
+3311%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 64.93
Recency 30 March 2009 24 August 2024
Physical cores 4 60
Threads 8 120
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 385 Watt

Xeon W3520 has 196.2% lower power consumption.

Xeon w9-3595X, on the other hand, has a 3317.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, and 1400% more physical cores and 1400% more threads.

The Xeon w9-3595X is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Xeon w9-3595X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Xeon w9-3595X
Xeon w9-3595X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 119 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 15 votes

Rate Xeon w9-3595X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Xeon w9-3595X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.