Xeon Silver 4209T vs W3520

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads, 130 Watt
1.84
Xeon Silver 4209T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.98
+279%

Xeon Silver 4209T outperforms Xeon W3520 by a whopping 279% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking19911002
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.2615.10
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency1.349.44
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$404$501

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4209T has 5708% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data22
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)11 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size263 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature68 °C91 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt70 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology1.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size24 GB1 TB
Max memory channels36
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data48

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3520 1.84
Xeon Silver 4209T 6.98
+279%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3520 2924
Xeon Silver 4209T 11080
+279%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.84 6.98
Recency 30 March 2009 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 8 16
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 70 Watt

Xeon Silver 4209T has a 279.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Xeon Silver 4209T is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3520 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Xeon Silver 4209T, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Xeon Silver 4209T

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4209T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Xeon Silver 4209T, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.