Xeon E5530 vs W3520

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W3520
2009
4 cores / 8 threads
1.90
+9.8%

W3520 outperforms E5530 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking18651924
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.1111.03
Market segmentServerServer
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Gainestown (2009−2010)
Release dateMarch 2009 (15 years ago)March 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$404$340
Current price$85 (0.2x MSRP)$37 (0.1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon E5530 has 255% better value for money than Xeon W3520.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads88
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2.66 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm45 nm
Die size263 mm2263 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °C76 °C
Number of transistors731 million731 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1366FCLGA1366,PLGA1366
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
AES-NI-no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.01.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-no data
Demand Based Switching++
PAE36 Bit40 Bit
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GB144 GB
Max memory channels33
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3520 1.90
+9.8%
Xeon E5530 1.73

W3520 outperforms E5530 by 10% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W3520 2937
+9.6%
Xeon E5530 2680

W3520 outperforms E5530 by 10% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3520 415
+21%
Xeon E5530 343

W3520 outperforms E5530 by 21% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W3520 1408
+1.7%
Xeon E5530 1384

W3520 outperforms E5530 by 2% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.90 1.73
Cost $404 $340
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 80 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Xeon E5530, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Xeon E5530
Xeon E5530

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 118 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 11 votes

Rate Xeon E5530 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Xeon E5530, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.