Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs Xeon W3520

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1983not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.27no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.34no data
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Kentsfield (2007)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)23 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$404$266

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.93 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)8 MB (shared)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die size263 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum core temperature68 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data62 °C
Number of transistors731 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1366775
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology1.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data

Security technologies

Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) are enumerated here.

VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2, DDR3
Maximum memory size24 GBno data
Max memory channels3no data
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W).

PCIe version2.02.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 30 March 2009 23 July 2007
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 95 Watt

Xeon W3520 has an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), on the other hand, has 36.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W3520 is a server/workstation processor while Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3520 and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3520
Xeon W3520
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 120 votes

Rate Xeon W3520 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 424 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3520 or Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.