Pentium Dual T3200 vs Xeon W3505
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W3505 outperforms Pentium Dual Core T3200 by an impressive 74% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2975 | 3273 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Pentium Dual Core |
| Power efficiency | 0.55 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (16 years ago) | 1 October 2008 (17 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 0.53 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.8V-1.225V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | 1366 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 1 MB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200 are enumerated here.
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3505 and Pentium Dual Core T3200.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.66 | 0.38 |
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 1 October 2008 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 1 Watt |
Xeon W3505 has a 73.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Pentium Dual T3200, on the other hand, has 12900% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon W3505 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Pentium Dual Core T3200 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W3505 is a server/workstation processor while Pentium Dual Core T3200 is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
