Opteron 4310 EE vs Xeon W3505
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2912 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Server |
Power efficiency | 0.21 | no data |
Designer | Intel | AMD |
Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Seoul (2012) |
Release date | 30 March 2009 (16 years ago) | 4 December 2012 (12 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $415 |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 2.53 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 0.53 GHz | 3 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 192 KB |
L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 4096 KB |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8192 KB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 263 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 731 million | 1,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
VID voltage range | 0.8V-1.225V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
Socket | 1366 | C32 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | no data |
AES-NI | - | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | - | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
Idle States | + | no data |
Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | no data |
EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
VT-x | + | no data |
EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | N/A | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3505 and Opteron 4310 EE.
PCIe version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 30 March 2009 | 4 December 2012 |
Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
Threads | 2 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 35 Watt |
Opteron 4310 EE has an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 271.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon W3505 and AMD Opteron 4310 EE. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.