i9-13900F vs Xeon W3503

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W3503
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 130 Watt
0.73
Core i9-13900F
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
33.43
+4479%

Core i9-13900F outperforms Xeon W3503 by a whopping 4479% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2696124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.1555.05
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.5146.90
Architecture codenameBloomfield (2008−2010)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date30 March 2009 (15 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$65$524

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900F has 1227% better value for money than Xeon W3503.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed2.4 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.4 GHz5.5 GHz
L1 cache64 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256 KB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size263 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors731 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.8V-1.225Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
Socket1366FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE36 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size24 GB192 GB
Max memory channels32
Maximum memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/Ano data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F.

PCIe version2.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W3503 0.73
i9-13900F 33.43
+4479%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W3503 1118
i9-13900F 51161
+4476%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.73 33.43
Recency 30 March 2009 4 January 2023
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 32
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 65 Watt

i9-13900F has a 4479.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 1100% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-13900F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W3503 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W3503 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3503 and Core i9-13900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W3503
Xeon W3503
Intel Core i9-13900F
Core i9-13900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate Xeon W3503 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 130 votes

Rate Core i9-13900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W3503 or Core i9-13900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.