A4-3330MX vs Xeon W3503
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W3503 outperforms A4-3330MX by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2717 | 2920 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.15 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Laptop |
| Series | no data | AMD A-Series |
| Power efficiency | 0.51 | 1.01 |
| Architecture codename | Bloomfield (2008−2010) | Llano (2011−2012) |
| Release date | 30 March 2009 (15 years ago) | 20 December 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $65 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 2 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 263 mm2 | 228 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 731 million | 1,178 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| VID voltage range | 0.8V-1.225V | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1366 | FS1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2 | 3DNow!, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4a, Radeon HD 6480G |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | no data |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 36 Bit | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
| EDB | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-x | + | no data |
| EPT | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 24 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 3 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | AMD Radeon HD 6480G (444 MHz) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.70 | 0.48 |
| Recency | 30 March 2009 | 20 December 2011 |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 130 Watt | 45 Watt |
Xeon W3503 has a 45.8% higher aggregate performance score.
A4-3330MX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 188.9% lower power consumption.
The Xeon W3503 is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-3330MX in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W3503 is a server/workstation processor while A4-3330MX is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W3503 and A4-3330MX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
