Core i9-14900F vs Xeon W-3375

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
38.19
+17.5%

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Core i9-14900F by a moderate 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking73112
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)Raptor Lake-R
Release date29 July 2021 (2 years ago)no data
Current priceno data$530

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3824 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads7632
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz5.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache57 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature80 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGX-no data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-5600, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size4 TB192 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F.

PCIe version45.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3375 38.19
+17.5%
i9-14900F 32.49

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Core i9-14900F by 18% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3375 59069
+17.5%
i9-14900F 50255

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Core i9-14900F by 18% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3375 1789
i9-14900F 2961
+65.5%

Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon W-3375 by 66% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3375 17324
i9-14900F 18588
+7.3%

Core i9-14900F outperforms Xeon W-3375 by 7% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.19 32.49
Physical cores 38 24
Threads 76 32
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 65 Watt

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i9-14900F in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Core i9-14900F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Intel Core i9-14900F
Core i9-14900F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 41 vote

Rate Core i9-14900F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Core i9-14900F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.