Apple M4 Max (16 cores) vs Xeon W-3375

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3375
2021
38 cores / 76 threads, 270 Watt
37.20
+33%
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
2024
16 cores / 16 threads, 90 Watt
27.97

Xeon W-3375 outperforms Apple M4 Max (16 cores) by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking86168
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M4
Power efficiency13.0429.41
Architecture codenameIce Lake-W (2021)no data
Release date29 July 2021 (3 years ago)30 October 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3816 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads7616
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.51 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache57 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography10 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketFCLGA4189no data
Power consumption (TDP)270 Watt90 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGX-no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores) are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M4 40-core GPU

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores).

PCIe version4no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.20 27.97
Recency 29 July 2021 30 October 2024
Physical cores 38 16
Threads 76 16
Chip lithography 10 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 270 Watt 90 Watt

Xeon W-3375 has a 33% higher aggregate performance score, and 137.5% more physical cores and 375% more threads.

Apple M4 Max (16 cores), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 233.3% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3375 is our recommended choice as it beats the Apple M4 Max (16 cores) in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3375 is a server/workstation processor while Apple M4 Max (16 cores) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3375 and Apple M4 Max (16 cores), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3375
Xeon W-3375
Apple M4 Max (16 cores)
M4 Max (16 cores)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-3375 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Apple M4 Max (16 cores) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3375 or Apple M4 Max (16 cores), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.