Xeon Gold 6538N vs W-3275M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
26.08
Xeon Gold 6538N
2023
32 cores / 64 threads, 205 Watt
29.40
+12.7%

Xeon Gold 6538N outperforms Xeon W-3275M by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking191160
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.9521.59
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency11.5813.05
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Emerald Rapids (2023)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453$3,351

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6538N has 336% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads5664
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache28 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB60 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data2x 763 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data85 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4677
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size2 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6480

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3275M 26.08
Xeon Gold 6538N 29.40
+12.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 39834
Xeon Gold 6538N 44895
+12.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.08 29.40
Recency 3 June 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 28 32
Threads 56 64

Xeon Gold 6538N has a 12.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 14.3% more physical cores and 14.3% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6538N is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3275M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3275M and Xeon Gold 6538N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 6538N
Xeon Gold 6538N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 63 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Gold 6538N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3275M or Xeon Gold 6538N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.