Xeon D-1733NT vs W-3275M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
22.91
+172%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Xeon D-1733NT by a whopping 172% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking261961
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.78no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency4.746.74
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)1 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$7,453no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads5616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache1.75 MBno data
L2 cache28 MBno data
L3 cache38.5 MB15 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature76 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt53 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size2 TB256 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes6416
USB revisionno data3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3275M 22.91
+172%
Xeon D-1733NT 8.42

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3275M 40419
+172%
Xeon D-1733NT 14849

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.91 8.42
Recency 3 June 2019 1 January 2022
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 53 Watt

Xeon W-3275M has a 172.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Xeon D-1733NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 286.8% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-1733NT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon D-1733NT
Xeon D-1733NT

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 64 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1733NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3275M and Xeon D-1733NT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.