Xeon X5260 vs W-3175X

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking	191	2513
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.74	no data
Market segment	Server	Server
Series	Intel Xeon W	no data
Architecture codename	Skylake (server) (2017−2019)	no data
Release date	19 December 2018 (5 years ago)	1 October 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$2,999	no data
Current price	$1500 (0.5x MSRP)	$1366

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	28 (Octacosa-Core)	no data
Threads	56	no data
Base clock speed	3.1 GHz	3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed	3.8 GHz	no data
Bus support	4 × 8 GT/s	no data
L1 cache	64K (per core)	no data
L2 cache	1 MB (per core)	no data
L3 cache	38.5 MB (shared)	6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Maximum core temperature	85 °C	66 °C
Number of transistors	8,000 million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	Yes	No
VID voltage range	no data	0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1	no data
Socket	FCLGA3647	LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)	255 Watt	80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions	Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512	no data
AES-NI	+	no data
AVX	+	no data
vPro	+	no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	+	+
Speed Shift	+	no data
Turbo Boost Technology	2.0	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	+	-
TSX	+	no data
Idle States	no data	+
Thermal Monitoring	no data	+
Demand Based Switching	no data	+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0	-	no data
FSB parity	no data	-
Status	Discontinued	Discontinued

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	+	-
EDB	+	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260 are enumerated here.

VT-d	+	no data
VT-x	+	+
EPT	+	no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4-2666	no data
Maximum memory size	512 GB	no data
Max memory channels	6	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	128.001 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	48	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

W-3175X outperforms X5260 by 2904% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Performance score	24.03	0.80
Recency	19 December 2018	1 October 2007
Chip lithography	14 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	255 Watt	80 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Xeon X5260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---