Intel Xeon W-3335 vs W-3175X

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

Xeon W-3175X
24.20

W-3335 outperforms W-3175X by 6% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking177159
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money16.8527.97
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-W (2021)
Release date19 December 2018 (5 years old)29 July 2021 (2 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999no data
Current price$1749 (0.6x MSRP)$1626
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3335 has 66% better value for money than Xeon W-3175X.

Technical specs

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)24 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °C68 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data78 °C
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt250 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335.

PCIe version3.04
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 24.20
Xeon W-3335 25.58
+5.7%

W-3335 outperforms W-3175X by 6% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3175X 37167
Xeon W-3335 39293
+5.7%

W-3335 outperforms W-3175X by 6% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.20 25.58
Recency 19 December 2018 29 July 2021
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 250 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and Xeon W-3335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
Intel Xeon W-3335
Xeon W-3335

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 117 votes

Rate Intel Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Intel Xeon W-3335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or Xeon W-3335, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.