EPYC 9654 vs Xeon W-3175X

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads
24.04
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.96
+228%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-3175X by 228% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1854
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money29.5510.10
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Genoa
Release date19 December 2018 (5 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999$11,805
Current price$1000 (0.3x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3175X has 193% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Technical specs

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)96
Threads56192
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size512 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 24.04
EPYC 9654 78.96
+228%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-3175X by 228% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3175X 37167
EPYC 9654 122091
+228%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-3175X by 228% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3175X 1462
EPYC 9654 1829
+25.1%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-3175X by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3175X 13561
EPYC 9654 18566
+36.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon W-3175X by 37% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 24.04 78.96
Recency 19 December 2018 10 November 2022
Physical cores 28 96
Threads 56 192
Cost $2999 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3175X in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 117 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.