EPYC 7313 vs Xeon W-3175X

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
26.67
+8.4%
EPYC 7313
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
24.61

Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 7313 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking185207
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.1417.21
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency9.8514.95
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date19 December 2018 (6 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7313 has 7% better value for money than Xeon W-3175X.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads5632
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3130
L1 cache64K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data4x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million16,600 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 26.67
+8.4%
EPYC 7313 24.61

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 42357
+8.4%
EPYC 7313 39091

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-3175X 1466
EPYC 7313 1487
+1.4%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-3175X 14191
+24.1%
EPYC 7313 11432

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.67 24.61
Recency 19 December 2018 15 March 2021
Physical cores 28 16
Threads 56 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon W-3175X has a 8.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 75% more physical cores and 75% more threads.

EPYC 7313, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 64.5% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7313, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
AMD EPYC 7313
EPYC 7313

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 119 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 31 vote

Rate EPYC 7313 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or EPYC 7313, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.