Ryzen 3 1300 vs Xeon W-2150B
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 584 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Power efficiency | 10.18 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 21 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 11 April 2017 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 96 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 13.75 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | 192 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 68 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4,800 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 2066 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 December 2017 | 11 April 2017 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 20 | 4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon W-2150B has an age advantage of 8 months, and 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads.
Ryzen 3 1300, on the other hand, has 84.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Xeon W-2150B is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 1300 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2150B and Ryzen 3 1300, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
