Opteron X2150 vs Xeon W-2150B
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 718 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Power efficiency | 4.11 | no data |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | no data |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Kyoto (2013) |
| Release date | 21 December 2017 (7 years ago) | 29 May 2013 (12 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 30 | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (shared) |
| L3 cache | 13.75 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 68 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 2066 | FT3 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 22 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 4 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | HD 8400 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2150B and Opteron X2150.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 21 December 2017 | 29 May 2013 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 4 |
| Threads | 20 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 22 Watt |
Xeon W-2150B has an age advantage of 4 years, 150% more physical cores and 400% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.
Opteron X2150, on the other hand, has 445.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon W-2150B and AMD Opteron X2150. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
