EPYC 4465P vs Xeon Silver 4416+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4416+
2023
20 cores / 40 threads, 165 Watt
27.45
EPYC 4465P
2025
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
31.40
+14.4%

EPYC 4465P outperforms Xeon Silver 4416+ by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking219169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation67.6275.43
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency6.4318.68
DesignerIntelAMD
ManufacturerIntelTSMC
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Grado (2025)
Release date10 January 2023 (2 years ago)13 May 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,186$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4465P has 12% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4416+.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads4024
Base clock speed2 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz5.4 GHz
L1 cache80K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache37.5 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data2x 70.6 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)82 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data16,630 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
Socket4677AM5
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5-4000DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P.

PCIe version5.05.0
PCI Express lanes8024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4416+ 27.45
EPYC 4465P 31.40
+14.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4416+ 44140
EPYC 4465P 50492
+14.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 27.45 31.40
Recency 10 January 2023 13 May 2025
Physical cores 20 12
Threads 40 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon Silver 4416+ has 66.7% more physical cores and 66.7% more threads.

EPYC 4465P, on the other hand, has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 153.8% lower power consumption.

The AMD EPYC 4465P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Silver 4416+ in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4416+
Xeon Silver 4416+
AMD EPYC 4465P
EPYC 4465P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4416 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 4465P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4416+ and EPYC 4465P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.