Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ vs EPYC 4245P
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 349 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 64.75 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 28.85 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Manufacturer | TSMC | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Grado (2025) | Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 13 May 2025 (recently) | 10 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $239 | $5,945 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5.4 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 32 MB (shared) | 60 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 70.6 mm2 | 4x 477 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 81 °C |
| Number of transistors | 8,315 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | AM5 | 4677 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 300 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR5-4800 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Graphics | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by EPYC 4245P and Xeon Platinum 8462Y+.
| PCIe version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 24 | 80 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 13 May 2025 | 10 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 32 |
| Threads | 12 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 300 Watt |
EPYC 4245P has an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 361.5% lower power consumption.
Xeon Platinum 8462Y+, on the other hand, has 433.3% more physical cores and 433.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between AMD EPYC 4245P and Intel Xeon Platinum 8462Y+. We've got no test results to judge.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
