EPYC 7302 vs Xeon Silver 4209T

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4209T
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
7.16
EPYC 7302
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 155 Watt
21.34
+198%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Xeon Silver 4209T by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking917230
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.7416.30
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$978
Current price$1020 (2x MSRP)$886 (0.9x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7302 has 184% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4209T.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache512 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache11 MB128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature91 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4209T 7.16
EPYC 7302 21.34
+198%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Xeon Silver 4209T by 198% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4209T 11080
EPYC 7302 33002
+198%

EPYC 7302 outperforms Xeon Silver 4209T by 198% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.16 21.34
Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Cost $501 $978
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 155 Watt

The EPYC 7302 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4209T in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4209T and EPYC 7302, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4209T
Xeon Silver 4209T
AMD EPYC 7302
EPYC 7302

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4209T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 30 votes

Rate EPYC 7302 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4209T or EPYC 7302, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.