Xeon X5260 vs Silver 4208

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4208
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.98
+806%

Xeon Silver 4208 outperforms Xeon X5260 by a whopping 806% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11102773
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.24no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency7.880.92
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date2 April 2019 (6 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$417no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)no data
Threads16no data
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache512 KBno data
L2 cache8 MBno data
L3 cache11 MB6 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C66 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
FSB parityno data-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4208 6.98
+806%
Xeon X5260 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4208 11198
+805%
Xeon X5260 1238

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.98 0.77
Recency 2 April 2019 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon Silver 4208 has a 806.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon X5260, on the other hand, has 6.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon Silver 4208 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon X5260 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208
Intel Xeon X5260
Xeon X5260

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4208 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 21 votes

Rate Xeon X5260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4208 and Xeon X5260, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.