Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon Silver 4110

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4110
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
6.60
+450%

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by a whopping 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking9762255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.011.35
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Skylake (2015−2016)
Release date11 July 2017 (6 years ago)19 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501$42
Current price$178 (0.4x MSRP)$42 (1x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4110 has 1012% better value for money than Celeron G3900TE.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads162
Base clock speed2.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus supportno data4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache512 KB128 KB
L2 cache8 MB512 KB
L3 cache11 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data98.57 mm210.3 mm × 9.57 mm
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647LGA-1151
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR3L-1600
Maximum memory size768 GB64 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 510

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4816

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4110 6.60
+450%
Celeron G3900TE 1.20

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 450% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4110 10204
+452%
Celeron G3900TE 1850

Xeon Silver 4110 outperforms Celeron G3900TE by 452% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.60 1.20
Recency 11 July 2017 19 October 2015
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 2
Cost $501 $42
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 35 Watt

The Xeon Silver 4110 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron G3900TE in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4110 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron G3900TE is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4110 and Celeron G3900TE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4110
Xeon Silver 4110
Intel Celeron G3900TE
Celeron G3900TE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 16 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Celeron G3900TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4110 or Celeron G3900TE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.