Ryzen 7 PRO 250 vs Xeon Silver 4109T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4109T
2017
8 cores / 16 threads, 70 Watt
6.45
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
12.22
+89.5%

Ryzen 7 PRO 250 outperforms Xeon Silver 4109T by an impressive 89% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1159707
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.41no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD Hawk Point (Zen 4/4c)
Power efficiency8.8441.86
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025)
Release date11 July 2017 (7 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$501no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB8 MB
L3 cache11 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data178 mm2
Maximum core temperature90 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FP8
Power consumption (TDP)70 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512USB 4, Ryzen AI (16 TOPS), AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A, SSSE3
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size768 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 780M ( - 2700 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4109T 6.45
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 12.22
+89.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4109T 10348
Ryzen 7 PRO 250 19597
+89.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.45 12.22
Recency 11 July 2017 6 January 2025
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 70 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 250 has a 89.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 150% lower power consumption.

The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Silver 4109T in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4109T is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4109T
Xeon Silver 4109T
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Ryzen 7 PRO 250

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4109T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4109T and Ryzen 7 PRO 250, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.