EPYC 9654 vs Xeon Platinum 8352Y

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Platinum 8352Y
2021
32 cores / 64 threads
44.81
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
79.71
+77.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 78% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking414
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money14.2011.92
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameno dataGenoa
Release date1 April 2021 (3 years old)10 November 2022 (1 year old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$11,805
Current price$4688 $3975 (0.3x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y has 19% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Technical specs

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores32 (Dotriaconta-Core)96
Threads64192
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cacheno data64K (per core)
L2 cacheno data1 MB (per core)
L3 cache48 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data12x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature81 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data2
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVXno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 44.81
EPYC 9654 79.71
+77.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 78% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8352Y 68643
EPYC 9654 122091
+77.9%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8352Y by 78% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 44.81 79.71
Recency 1 April 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 32 96
Threads 64 192
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8352Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8352Y and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8352Y
Xeon Platinum 8352Y
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 4 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8352Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8352Y or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.