EPYC 7H12 vs Xeon Platinum 8175M

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon Platinum 8175M
24 cores / 48 threads
17.24
EPYC 7H12
2019
64 cores / 128 threads
45.02
+161%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by 161% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

Comparing Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking33338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation3.3022.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon PlatinumAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release dateno data18 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$540 $1970

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7H12 has 575% better value for money than Xeon Platinum 8175M.

Detailed Specifications

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads48128
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.3 GHz
L1 cache1.5 MB96K (per core)
L2 cache24 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache33 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketSocket PTR4
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+no data

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1,536 GB tdp=240 Watt4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Platinum 8175M 17.24
EPYC 7H12 45.02
+161%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by 161% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Platinum 8175M 26659
EPYC 7H12 69633
+161%

EPYC 7H12 outperforms Xeon Platinum 8175M by 161% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 17.24 45.02
Physical cores 24 64
Threads 48 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

The EPYC 7H12 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Platinum 8175M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Platinum 8175M and EPYC 7H12, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8175M
Xeon Platinum 8175M
AMD EPYC 7H12
EPYC 7H12

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 26 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8175M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 450 votes

Rate EPYC 7H12 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Platinum 8175M or EPYC 7H12, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.