EPYC 7773X vs Xeon Platinum 8173M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Platinum 8173M
28 cores / 56 threads
15.89
EPYC 7773X
2022
64 cores / 128 threads, 280 Watt
51.78
+226%

EPYC 7773X outperforms Xeon Platinum 8173M by a whopping 226% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking48445
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Platinumno data
Power efficiencyno data19.84
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Milan-X (2022)
Release dateno data22 March 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads56128
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1.75 MB64K (per core)
L2 cache28 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache38.5 MB768 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration8 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketSocket PSP3
Power consumption (TDP)no data280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1,536 GBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 15.89
EPYC 7773X 51.78
+226%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Platinum 8173M 28025
Samples: 3
EPYC 7773X 91340
+226%
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.89 51.78
Physical cores 28 64
Threads 56 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm

EPYC 7773X has a 225.9% higher aggregate performance score, 128.6% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7773X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Platinum 8173M
Xeon Platinum 8173M
AMD EPYC 7773X
EPYC 7773X

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 12 votes

Rate Xeon Platinum 8173M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 23 votes

Rate EPYC 7773X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Platinum 8173M and EPYC 7773X, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.